On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:20:15 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: > Geoffrey Talvola wrote: >> Chuck Esterbrook wrote: >> >>> A "cvs update" is taking several minutes (and still running). >>> Anyone else having this problem? >> >> I've had that problem often, I would say just about every time >> I've used SourceForge CVS in the last month or two. > > SF CVS kind of sucks. Well, "kind of" is a bit of an > understatement. There remains the option of moving to w4py's svn > server, or ask python-hosting.com to host a subversion repository > (they'd might be able to maintain it a bit better than we could, > and they advertise free svn and Trac hosting to Python projects).
Okay, it's definitely time to move. Besides the past couple of months, SF has had CVS problems at other times as well. I have a preference for svn over cvs, but could live with cvs if developers demand it. Although it sounds like Ian prefers svn, so that makes 2 of us. I don't have a preference for where it's hosted as long as it works. If we used w4py's server, who would maintain it? In other words, who would be the svn admin? Also, would non-developers still get anon access? -Chuck ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list Webware-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
