Dan Milstein wrote: > After looking carefully at HTTPHandler, I think I've found a way > to avoid holding that file in memory. I wanted to ask the list if > there was a reason for the current design that I'm missing. If not, > I'd propose the patch below as an improvement to the built-in HTTP > server.
Your patch looks good; I have already checked in something similar. The built-in HTTP server was never intended for production use or use with such big files, so probably nobody cared about performance. Or does somebody else see a reason for wrapping the input file in such a way? -- Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list Webware-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
