Dan Milstein wrote:
> After looking carefully at HTTPHandler, I think I've found a way
 > to  avoid holding that file in memory.  I wanted to ask the list if
 > there was a reason for the current design that I'm missing.  If not,
 > I'd propose the patch below as an improvement to the built-in HTTP
 > server.

Your patch looks good; I have already checked in something similar.
The built-in HTTP server was never intended for production use or use 
with such big files, so probably nobody cared about performance. Or does 
somebody else see a reason for wrapping the input file in such a way?

-- Chris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
Webware-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel

Reply via email to