On Monday 31 December 2001 11:48 am, Tavis Rudd wrote: > +1 , but lets think through the actual API changes it would entail: > > * trans.request instead of trans.request(), trans.response.write(...) > instead of trans.response().write(...), etc.
Nice. > * trans.request() and trans.response() would raise an exception, etc. Which would make sense in the new format. > * lots of changes to existing servlet code !!! though a conversion > tool could ease migration I feel obligated that the project provide a conversion tool with the release that uses the properties style. I have 2 juicy projects I can test such a tool on and I'm sure there are others who would be willing to help with testing that. > What about the internal attributes/methods that are underscored? Most of the underscored attributes are to prevent name conflicts with their methods. Other underscored attributes are never exposed for reading by external users of the class and should remain so. Likewise for methods. Another interesting question: Can a script aid in the conversion of Webware, or is it better to just go line by line with the occasional search and replace? .response() --> .response ._response --> .response -Chuck _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
