Tripp Lilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Geoffrey Talvola wrote: > > > Another approach is to avoid threads and use a database > > adapter specifically > > designed for integration with Twisted's event loop (I don't > > know if such > > things exist, but it seems that Twisted has a little of > > everything...). But > > in that case you're back to "contorting" your code to fit > > the async model. > > Looking at some of the servlets I'm using, with significant > > amounts of code > > and potentially many SQL queries involved, I shudder to think at the > > convolutions I'd have to put into place to make them fit a > > purely async > > model. It just doesn't fit my brain and would make the > > code significantly > > more complicated and less understandable and maintainable. > > All this talk led me to take another look at Twisted :) I won't like > it[1], but then, that's because I don't like anything :) (ask Chuck). > > However, while I was reading the docs, I came across "Twisted > Enterprise", > which is an asynchronous wrapper around the DB API, with its own > connection pooling and what-not: > > http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/howto/enterprise > > This might answer your SQL question?
Yes, it does. Using this, you could write efficient async code that uses SQL without explicitly using threads yourself. But what I find amusing is that Twisted Enterprise's implementation actually uses threads itself, internally. - Geoff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
