On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Tavis Rudd wrote: > Why don't you create a temporary development branch of the cvs?
I gotta throw a +1 onto this fire :) I synced the other night to the CVS head having not seen this message and was bummed when it barfed on me. Since I was actively working on something else, I didn't bother to chase down the barf, but reverted to 0.8. But I agree with Tavis... radical work should (IMHO) go on in a dev branch until it's "close" to stable. Some oddball corner cases are okay, but general stability is desirable in the mainline. > On Wednesday 19 March 2003 04:04, Ian Bicking wrote: > > > > CVS has been very stable previously. You should not expect that, at > > least for the next couple weeks. 0.8 is has all the features that CVS > > does (prior to these commits), so use that if you want stability. But > > if you don't mind bugs, please help me test! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
