I use UserManagerToMiddleKit, but that's more because of ignorance of the Role* variants than a conscious design descision on my part. I'm sure it goes without saying that the UserKit docs could use some work.
-Seth On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 20:01 -0500, Winston Wolff wrote: > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Does anybody use UserKit? I'm going to simplify it for my own needs > and I want to know if I should try to roll my changes back into > Webware. What I plan to do is: > * Add more test cases, > * Add storage of Roles in MiddleKit. > * Remove half of the different options for user managers with roles. > > Right now there are four permutations of UserManager: > - UserManagerToFile > - UserManagerToMiddleKit > - RoleUserManagerToFile > - RoleUserManagerToMiddleKit > > I don't see any situation where you would not want roles, so I plan to > eliminate the two versions that do not have roles. This will reduce > the number of permutations that need to be tested and make it easier > to maintain. > > -winston > > _________________________________________ > winston wolff - (646) 827-2242 - http://www.stratolab.com - learning > by creating -- Seth Remington SaberLogic, LLC 661-B Weber Drive Wadsworth, Ohio 44281 Phone: (330)335-6442 Fax: (330)336-8559 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
