> FormKit is still maintained, but there's not much "action"... it pretty
> much does what it does. We're not improving it much. We get the
> occasional bugfix from the community, but that's about it.
That's pretty similar to Webware itself, so it would make sense to throw
them together.
True. Fine by us.
> We'd be open to rolling FormKit into webware, but FormKit really isn't
> webware-centric. We have a glue servlet that makes it work very well,
> but it can be used on its own, too. I don't think that many people do
> that, but I use it in Pylons.
I thought it was more Webware-centric. So maybe we should integrate
FunFormKit instead, and mention FormKit and FormEncode as alternatives
in the docs? I just like the idea to have some basic HTML and HTML-Form
support already built-in in Webware.
I'm not sure that it has to be "centric" to be compatible. Truth is we made it for Webkit, but thought that it was important (and simple) to make it generalized, so we did.
FunFormKit is more "centric" in that it can't run without Webkit, but I think Ian has pretty significantly moved on to FormEncode.
If there is sufficient interest, I could make FormKit into an egg, and get it into the Cheese Shop... then it could be required by Webkit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
