I see. I guess it isn't too much trouble providing some of the default conversions, but I'm not someone who can make that call :).
--- Chris Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Cuong, > > Yes I have, however I'm trying to avoid property-editors where possible. I > think it's overkill (and a bit ugly) to have to create a (potentially quite > large) BeanInfo class for every action that I want to pass an Integer in to, > given that I don't need to do any special validation on that field. I just > need to ensure it is either null or a valid integer - new Integer(String) > can handle that easily enough, and to me sounds like a sensible default > behaviour for WW to implement. [My action ends up calling a session EJB > which will complain if there is a problem with the data, so property-editor > validation isn't really useful for me in this case] > > It seems to me that it would be nice for WebWork to provide a default > conversion automatically in base cases like this. Thoughts? > > > >FROM: Cuong Tran > >DATE: 02/22/2002 15:54:12 > >SUBJECT: RE: [Webwork-user] Integer properties > > > Have you looked at the examples? > > >Like webwork.action.test.bank.AmountEditor class. > > _______________________________________________ > Webwork-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user ===== Cuong Q. Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
