On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:02:10PM +0100, Rickard wrote: > >could be this... > >http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/7709/2002/1/100/7451920/
> But, what would the gain be compared to using static method in > ActionContext? It is definitely more code to implement interfaces and > you can't do it just anywhere (you can only do it in the action class, > not in classes used inside action). If we compare with J2EE, they took > the route of the static method access by introducing the "java:comp/env" > namespace in JNDI (which effectively is the same as a static method). > It worked there, so why not here? Yes, that's an interesting and true view. For me though +1 for static methods and ThreadLocals and all the other ugly stuff ;-)) -billy. -- Meisterbohne S�flinger Stra�e 100 Tel: +49-731-399 499-0 eL�sungen 89077 Ulm Fax: +49-731-399 499-0 _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
