This is because a print image is being used to send to the other
clearinghouses out of the Misys system, and there's no place on the
print image to put a taxonomy code.  Lots of other gaps as well.  

Clearly, the complexity of which formats are being used, the
plurality/combination of vendors and clearinghouses in use, the
necessary system changes, and the new data collection requirements make
individual provider testing necessary for HIPAA transaction (read:
provider cash flow) success.  This can be done, but we must work
smarter, not harder.

Regards,

Larry Watkins
Executive Vice President
Claredi Corporation
Office: (801) 444-0339 x204
Mobile: (770) 331-1898
Fax: (770) 419-5295


-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Paramore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:19 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Testing Subworkgroup List
Subject: PMS / CH Vendor "readiness"

Please see the question below from a HAWK member.  It is a great example
of
the situations providers are running into daily.

Best Regards,

Miriam J. Paramore
President & CEO
PCI: e-commerce for healthcare
9001 Shelbyville Road
iTRC Building
Louisville, KY 40222
502-429-8555
www.hipaasurvival.com
===========================================
This email contains confidential information intended only for the named
addressee(s). Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other
person is strictly prohibited.


---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: Re: Seventh HIPAA Implementation Roundtable-February 28,
2003
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:04:29 -0500

As a medical practice I have been focusing most of my attention on
complying with the Privacy regulations.  I am now turning my attention
to complying with the transaction and code set regulations.  All
along I
have thought that my PMS and my clearinghouses would be doing all the
work and all I would have to do is load an upgrade, test a time or two
and "presto" - I'm compliant!  I am being told by my PMS (Medic/Mysis)
that we will no longer be able to transmit electronically to our
clearinghouses (Zirmed and MMR).  Due to HIPAA Regulations we will
have
to use Mysis for our electronic claims processing.  It has something
to
do with codes such as the taxonomy code which are not required on a
HCFA
claim that are required on electronic claims.  Mysis says they are not
writing programs that will allow such codes to be downloaded and sent
to
another clearinghouse in a format that is HIPAA compliant. I would
suppose that is their right.  But I need to better understand what it
is
that I am asking Mysis to do in order to argue the reason why they
should do it.  Is it really that difficult for Mysis to write a
program?
Mysis uses a third party to process our claims electronically
(probably
someone like NEIC).  Is it something that a provider could pay Mysis
to
write the program and it shouldn't be an unreasonable fee?  Does
Mysis'
statement make sense to you?  Can you better help me understand it?  I
can't fight something I don't understand.  Obviously there are
financial
reasons for wanting to continue using the clearinghouses I currently
use
plus I don't like being told "no" and "do it or drop to paper" -
that's
your only choice.


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the
individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of
the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an
official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products
and services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for
personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-testing as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the
same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the
Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-testing as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org

Reply via email to