thanks for the info my highest rain rates recorded since june 2014 was 100mm/h 1.6mm/min or 8mm/5min i choose to filter 3cm /5min max because i want to avoid erratic crazy data from my weather station (like 33m the other day) but i want to stay in reasonable high limit. same thing for the wind i put a max to 90 knots which i fortunately will never reach but my station already show me 999 knots :)
On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 12:13:10 PM UTC+7, Andrew Milner wrote: > > Differences between metricwx and metric are here: > http://www.weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#units > > and here > http://www.weewx.com/docs/usersguide.htm#StdConvert > > It is all about the units in the database not the reports - since the > reports can be in any units you wish. > > FYI the world record is 38mm in 1 minute = 190 in 5. or 126mm in 8 > minutes = 79 in 5, or 198mm in 15 mins = 66 in 5 > > > > On Saturday, 17 December 2016 06:37:36 UTC+2, Marc Aubry wrote: > >> by Metric i mean that my database and reports use mbar, knots, mm >> according to the weewx config file. >> i don't know the difference between METRIC and METRICWX ????? >> Oups!!!! >> you are right, i better lower the max rain. i was thinking per day and >> not by archive period. i'm living on the equator and we can have 200mm my >> archive period is standard (5min) so i'll put 3cm to be safe... >> >> thanks >> >> >> >> >> On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 8:04:49 AM UTC+7, Tom Keffer wrote: >>> >>> You say you're using the metric system. Is that METRIC? Or, METRICWX? If >>> the former, your StdQC would eliminate any data that has more than 300 cm >>> of rain in an archive period. Unless your archive period is unusually long, >>> you could probably make it as little as 1 cm. >>> >>> -tk >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Marc Aubry <marco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> hi, >>>> Is there not a faster way than rebuilding the all tables? >>>> i have data from june 2014 in the database because i have imported the >>>> data from my previous cumulus system. >>>> it take a long time to rebuild the all daily summaries from a raspberry >>>> just to correct one bad entries? >>>> >>>> is it enough to put max and min valuse in StdQC to avoid such problem? >>>> mine look like that (metric system): >>>> >>>> *[StdQC]* >>>> * [[MinMax]]* >>>> * barometer = 900, 1100* >>>> * outTemp = 10, 60* >>>> * inTemp = 10, 60* >>>> * outHumidity = 0, 100* >>>> * inHumidity = 0, 100* >>>> * windSpeed = 0, 90* >>>> * pressure = 900, 1100* >>>> * rain=0, 300* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "weewx-user" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to weewx-user+...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
