Was thinking about this myself this morning. With weeWX-WD we implemented a separate (local) database by creating our own WdArchive service which uses a different binding and schema. There is probably no reason why a similar approach could not be taken and a service implemented based on StdArchive that uses a different binding but the same schema. Certainly something weeWX cannot do out of the box, it would require knowledge of weeWX workings and a bit of python to make it work.
Can't really think of a reason why you would take this approach though; way too complex and I would expect somewhat fragile. SQL replication as suggested by Pat would be far easier and more robust I expect. Gary On Thursday, 13 December 2018 11:07:32 UTC+10, Pat wrote: > > No, weewx doesn't do that. > > You could setup MySQL replication and have the MySQL server handle that > though. > > On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 5:53:30 PM UTC-5, Rodrigo Scuissiato > wrote: >> >> Is it possible to have one instance of weewx running and recording to two >> databases? >> One mysql local and one remote? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.