On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 4:28:19 AM UTC-4, Gert Andersen wrote: > Hi Gary > > > Thanks for looking. > > > It works with multiple instances listening to different ports, so the > solution, buy more GW1000 devices. > > > I'm also using mqtt and the solution here was to have 1 instance publishing > and the other instances just subscribing to the topic. Using Belchertown. > > > Maybe in the future, Interceptor can do the same. > > > Gert > > On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 8:39:09 AM UTC+2, gjr80 wrote: > Well that answers that question :) Was reading through the interceptor driver > and was starting to come to that conclusion. > > > > Gary > > On Thursday, 21 May 2020 16:19:27 UTC+10, Gert Andersen wrote: > Hi > > > Unfortunately, it seems not possible to have 2 weewx instances using the same > port: > > > > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] INFO user.interceptor: driver > version is 0.53 > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] INFO user.interceptor: device > type: ecowitt-client > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] INFO user.interceptor: mode is > listen > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] INFO user.interceptor: listen on > :8000 > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] ERROR weewx.engine: Import of > driver failed: [Errno 98] Address already in use (<class 'OSError'>) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > Traceback (most recent call last): > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/home/weewx/bin/weewx/engine.py", line 103, in setupStation > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > self.console = loader_function(config_dict, self) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/home/weewx/bin/user/interceptor.py", line 315, in loader > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > return InterceptorDriver(**config_dict[DRIVER_NAME]) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/home/weewx/bin/user/interceptor.py", line 2523, in __init__ > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > self._device = self.DEVICE_TYPES.get(self._device_type)(**stn_dict) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/home/weewx/bin/user/interceptor.py", line 2298, in __init__ > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > super(EcowittClient, self).__init__( > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/home/weewx/bin/user/interceptor.py", line 429, in __init__ > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > self._server = Consumer.TCPServer(address, port, handler) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/home/weewx/bin/user/interceptor.py", line 584, in __init__ > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > TCPServer.__init__(self, (address, int(port)), handler) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/usr/lib/python3.8/socketserver.py", line 452, in __init__ > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > self.server_bind() > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > File "/usr/lib/python3.8/socketserver.py", line 466, in server_bind > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > self.socket.bind(self.server_address) > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL weewx.engine: **** > OSError: [Errno 98] Address already in use > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL __main__: Unable to load > driver: [Errno 98] Address already in use > May 21 08:13:52 GAND weewx-billeder[17360] CRITICAL __main__: **** > Exiting... > > Gert > > > > On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 7:52:53 AM UTC+2, Gert Andersen wrote: > Hi > > > Yes multiple weewx instances listening to the same port. I have 2 weewx > instances serving two different domain(different languages). It could be > fine, if they can use the same port. Otherwise I need 2 GW1000 devices using > different ports or..? > > > Gert > > On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 6:31:52 AM UTC+2, gjr80 wrote: > > Hi Gert, > > > Do you mean multiple WeeWX instances on the same machine listening to the > same port? To be truthful I don't know but I would have expected there would > be some contention there somewhere. It's an easy enough experiment to do > though, you just need another WeeWX config file with the appropriate settings > changed and then run directly. > > > Gary > > On Thursday, 21 May 2020 14:09:56 UTC+10, Gert Andersen wrote: > Hi Gary > > > Thanks, working now. > > > Do you know if I can more weewx instances running using the same port 8000? > > > Gert > > On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:57:30 AM UTC+2, gjr80 wrote: > > Hi, > > > Not an error as such but an informational log entry that the interceptor > driver did not recognise PASSKEY. It just happens that this unfortunately > causes the passkey to be logged in full and unobfuscated. I have submitted a > PR to Matthew to fix the issue, I am sure he will get around to it in due > course. In the interim, you can fix the problem by applying the change to > interceptor.py that is included in the PR. > > > > Gary > > > On Thursday, 21 May 2020 07:36:02 UTC+10, Gert Andersen wrote: > Hi > > > Weewx4.0 > Interceptor 0.54 > Ubuntu 20.04 > GW1000 > > > I get this error: > INFO user.interceptor: unrecognized parameter > b'PASSKEY=5E7384C4921D13C0A8572F8XXXXXXXXXXX > > all the time. I have registered the device with Ecowitt.net. > > > Can I do anything about that? > > > One more question, can I have more weewx instances listen to same interceptor > port or is the port locked with the first instance? > > > Thanks > Gert
In the future maybe WeeWX will finally support the GW1000 local network API instead of needing to capture Ecowitt protocol packets. The difference is pull versus push. You would then not need to configure the GW1000 to push data from the GW1000. Other software; Cumulus MX, Meteobridge, and Weather-Display use the API pull method. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/2fb529e5-c2cc-4869-896c-c0f33ecf85cf%40googlegroups.com.
