Thank you for that suggestion, I will expeditiously follow up! On Saturday, 13 March 2021 at 14:05:03 UTC+13 gjr80 wrote:
> So you are back using the original Envoy that was 'tripping the fuse'? > Regards the two beeps from the Envoy I understand the first indicates > successful startup of the processor and the second verifies the > installation of the logger so it seems your single beep does point to an > issue with the logger. Given you have things working again it might be > worthwhile contacting Davis in slower time and finding out if you do have > an incompatible Envoy/logger or if there is some other issue with one or > the other. If your original Envoy just started working again it could just > as easily stop as well; having a backup would be handy. > > Gary > On Saturday, 13 March 2021 at 10:38:16 UTC+10 monmul wrote: > >> A big THANK YOU to all who helped me out on this, I really appreciate the >> help and guidance....sorry it turned into a wild goose chase! >> >> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 16:24:28 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >> >>> Yep fully functional again....updating on the website...WTF!.....are >>> these things sent to us to just test our patience!! >>> >>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 13:30:30 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >>> >>>> Hmmm! even more curiouser....I notice from my webpage that data was >>>> collected and posted yesterday....after having nothing updated for almost >>>> 2 >>>> weeks! >>>> >>>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 13:06:27 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, if it is the RPi then it is either a sofward corruption on the >>>>> card caused by the repeated rebooting after the fuse trips....or else >>>>> some >>>>> hardward failure on the board was the cause of the tripping. Its strange >>>>> that since reassembling the Envoy, RPi etc there has not been a fuse trip. >>>>> >>>>> One other thought occurs to me...I have a powered USB Hub attached to >>>>> the RPi(its a 3B)....maybe I should disconnect the hub and try the Envoy >>>>> directly into the RPi......if minicom works that would point to the Hub >>>>> as >>>>> being the culpit....!!?? >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 12:51:51 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo /etc/init.d/weewx stop >>>>>> [ ok ] Stopping weewx (via systemctl): weewx.service. >>>>>> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ wee_device --clear-memory >>>>>> Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf >>>>>> Using Vantage driver version 3.2.1 (weewx.drivers.vantage) >>>>>> Proceeding will erase all archive records. >>>>>> Are you sure you wish to proceed (y/n)? y >>>>>> Erasing all archive records ... >>>>>> Archive records erased. >>>>>> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo minicom -b 19200 -D /dev/ttyUSB0 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Welcome to minicom 2.7 >>>>>> >>>>>> OPTIONS: I18n >>>>>> Compiled on Apr 22 2017, 09:14:19. >>>>>> Port /dev/ttyUSB0, 12:49:30 >>>>>> >>>>>> Press CTRL-A Z for help on special keys >>>>>> . >>>>>> . >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Again no return of TEST or NVER >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 12:46:43 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> So, having put the old Envoy back on the Rpi (having shown it worked >>>>>>> on the PC) this is what I get....looks like some kind of continuous >>>>>>> Loop >>>>>>> situation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo /etc/init.d/weewx stop >>>>>>> [ ok ] Stopping weewx (via systemctl): weewx.service. >>>>>>> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo minicom -b 19200 -D /dev/ttyUSB0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Welcome to minicom 2.7 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OPTIONS: I18n >>>>>>> Compiled on Apr 22 2017, 09:14:19. >>>>>>> Port /dev/ttyUSB0, 12:42:51 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Press CTRL-A Z for help on special keys >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOO1 =vˆ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ b 2 >>>>>>> v)LOO1 =vˆ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ b 2 >>>>>>> ULOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ¾LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ±LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> «LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> «LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ¾—LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ¾—LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ³˜LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ³˜LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ]eLOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Á LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Á LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Á LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ³˜LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ¤LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> âYLOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5⊑? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >>>>>>> ¾LOO1 =vŠ 4I Áÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 12:40:56 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But from the tests on my PC, it seems the old Envoy is >>>>>>>> working....does it not.(so we do not have to worry about the new Envoy >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> now!)...so it would appear as if the RPi is the culpit....have I >>>>>>>> deducted >>>>>>>> correctly? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 02:29:03 UTC+13 tke...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They did, but it was about 7 or 8 years ago. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You really need to call Davis. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:22 PM Graham Eddy <graha...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i do recall that davis introduced an incompatability between old >>>>>>>>>> firmware and new datalogger but i don’t recall the details. i’m sure >>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> search of the forum archive would see if that was relevant >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 11 Mar 2021, at 2:17 pm, monmul <dunb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes I am using the original data logger and cable that came with >>>>>>>>>> the old Envoy....I take out the data logger from he old one and put >>>>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>>>> the new one...I suspect that the data logger may not be compatible >>>>>>>>>> with the >>>>>>>>>> new Envoy >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to weewx-user+...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/A4FF1391-8844-4E16-8B1D-C2F6C6F06A3B%40gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/A4FF1391-8844-4E16-8B1D-C2F6C6F06A3B%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/8a3ae1a1-7e3e-4b16-868e-fdeaf510808an%40googlegroups.com.
