@michael:  It should not be related to the SCP upload, which continues even 
after weewx has gone "night night".  It is running from a cron, not under 
weewx.  It merely copies the generated HTML/graphics up to another 
machine.  It runs  every 17  minutes.  If it were, say, locking up a file 
and causing a report to fail there ought to be a message from Python about 
that, and there are no such messages.  This same SCP was running with weewx 
version 3 for many months without issues - originally every 15 minutes, I 
changed it from 15 to 17 yesterday to put it out of sync from the report 
generation a bit it after the second failure, just in case.  

[It did occur to me to add a little mod akin to the RSYNC present in weewx 
itself, or to cut over to using  then RSYNC under weewx after the rest of 
this gets straightened out.]

I also verified that all of the files and directories are owned by and have 
the same group as the weewx process, and they are, so it should not be an 
issue of file permissions during report generation, either.

Regarding the dev release driver, sure, I'll give that a try, and turn on 
more logging later today.

JRJ

On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 1:40:52 AM UTC-5 michael.s...@gmail.com wrote:

> Nah, the logging level change doesn't matter, I've published a dev release 
> a few days ago making exactly that change.
>
> I'd suggest you to try the new driver version anyway since I also made 
> some changes regarding the HTTP interaction with the WLL. You should also 
> enable debug logging so we get a more exhaustive look into what's going on.
>
> My suspicion is that something's wrong with the report generation or the 
> SCP upload. Was the last iteration of the report actually uploaded 
> correctly?
>
>
>
> vince schrieb am Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021 um 06:10:01 UTC+2:
>
>> On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 12:43:44 PM UTC-7 cub...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> (Note: I  did "tweaked" the WLL driver code to suppress the "Emitting 
>>> poll/(broadcast) messages by changing those two log calls to "log.debug").  
>>
>>
>> I'd suggest running the unaltered driver and especially in this case so 
>> you get the maximum logging so the author can help you.
>>
>> If you start changing his code, eventually it'll be "you changed it, you 
>> own the results good or bad" when he can't recreate the issue because your 
>> code has diverged from the authoritative version.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/417b50a5-b506-47b6-a101-7eae9d8d4e51n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to