Bootstrap graphic:
[image: Rain_bootstrap.png]

    [[rain]]
       aggregate_interval_minutes = 30
        [[[rain]]]
            plotType = bar #new: specify plot type
            aggregateType = sum #new: specify type for aggregation
            aggregateInterval = 1800 #new: specify aggreagtion inteval in 
seconds for each series
            payload_key = rain_in
            showMaxMarkPoint = false
            showMinMarkPoint = false
            showAvgMarkLine = false
            lineColor = '#428bca'
            decimals = 2
        [[[hail]]]
            plotType = bar #new: specify plot type
            aggregateType = sum #new: specify type for aggregation
            aggregateInterval = 1800 #new: specify aggreagtion inteval in 
seconds for each series
            payload_key = hail_in
            showMaxMarkPoint = false
            showMinMarkPoint = false
            showAvgMarkLine = false
            lineColor = '#f20e3c'
            decimals = 2

Werner Krenn schrieb am Donnerstag, 11. September 2025 um 20:47:51 UTC+2:

> Sorry, I can't find any errors with the piezo rain rate, 
> although the piezo rain rate below 1.5 mm/hr is actually useless.
> I've already written to Ecowitt support about this.
> For the piezo rain rate (in my case, the hail value), I have to multiply 
> the value by 25.4 in the graph 
> (and only there) to get the display in mm.
>
> [image: Rain_current.png]
> p q schrieb am Donnerstag, 11. September 2025 um 19:41:09 UTC+2:
>
>> I am pretty sure the US uses the international inch for far longer. Since 
>> before I started working with canadian companies in the 1990s. There is 
>> official looking documentation that shows the international yard (and thus 
>> the inch) defined in 1959 
>> https://usma.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/sp447-app5.pdf?x40840
>> There are still various survey foot definitions with slightly different 
>> values in the US, and of course the nautical mile and related measures. 
>> https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/geodesy/international-foot.html
>>
>> This rabbit hole is deep if you want to dive into it.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:26 AM John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Sept 2025 at 02:18, Paul R Anderson <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Inches and millimeters have a conversion ratio where one value is 
>>>> approximately 1/29 the other. Specifically, 1 inch is equivalent to 25.4 
>>>> millimeters. The approximation is not exact but is a common comparison for 
>>>> visual estimation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The inch was standardised to be exactly 25.4mm, except for the US, 
>>> although that changed in 2020 according to Wikipedia.
>>>  
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "weewx-user" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAGTinV4mAG387-k2eidpaZMDZ7i5OTh2diZHjcpHof0ZzqQsig%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAGTinV4mAG387-k2eidpaZMDZ7i5OTh2diZHjcpHof0ZzqQsig%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Peter Quinn
>> (415)794-2264 <(415)%20794-2264>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/ba6a8a94-c890-41b3-be11-b4c363a7814cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to