I think it's interesting how far the LLM enabled me to go. Just setting up the configs was interesting, I saw it make a lot of the same errors I would have been likely to make (appending text strings instead of replacing, for instance).
Ultimately, it's working, and I've shared it on github and docker. But it's fair to challenge what's up there to make it better, and make sure there isn't anything unnecessary or sloppy. If anyone is interested in helping, I'm open to learning and improving. On Thursday, May 21, 2026 at 7:38:37 AM UTC-4 Greg Troxel wrote: > WeatheredScientist <[email protected]> writes: > > > @Vince, great questions. Keeping in mind, this whole build was heavily > > AI-assisted, i used claude to answer some of your questions, but i think > > the responses are reasonable. Please challenge if they are slop! > > Different people have different norms, but I think it's not ok to ask > other humans to wade through and fix LLM output. It's usually overly > verbose, and wrong in ways that are harder to spot than an actual > confused human. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/6eb34978-d589-4b59-aeaf-5746e8d44aa8n%40googlegroups.com.
