That was brilliant!  Absolutely hilarious!  You got his style DOWN, 
man!  How do you come up with stuff?  Oh yeah, you should do a 
column "reimagining" every week.  Keep us going for a while.  




--- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since we're still stuck in the winter of our discontent, our Dark 
Age 
> before the Dawning of the New Light of Our Beloved Gene, I have 
> decided to take forth the reins of hilarity and Channel Gene with a 
> Just Inside The Beltway column. 
> 
> Essentially, I shall rewrite a classic Gene column and show what 
> would happen if everybody's favorite middle aged culturally Jewish 
> humor writer from New York had been replaced with, well, me. A 
> bonafide Maryland mutt with no real moral compass or the complusion 
> to do anything about it. 
> 
> 
> 
> Ray's Close Shave
> The adventures of a not-so-smooth operator
> 
> Originally done By Gene Weingarten
> Sunday, June 25, 2006; Page W40
> 
> 
> The question that we columnists hear most frequently is: "Do you 
use 
> water when you bathe, or just an ungodly amount of Axe deoderant 
> spray?" It's a stupid question, because I'm almost 34, and 
everybody 
> knows that only socially-awkward 15 year old boys use Axe because 
> they're too young to get Drakkar (that's for the 18 year olds). So 
I 
> generally ask people to rephrase it using proper grammar, which 
they 
> do: "Have you ever groomed yourself, assface?"
> 
> Today, I will end the unpleasantness with a straight answer. We 
> columnists do our grooming in many ways: applying creams, scented 
> lotions, attaching various vibrating devices to appendages that can 
> be found at MVC, 5625 Leesburg Pike, Bailey's Crossroads, Falls 
> Church Virginia, by writing things for bored humor enthusiasts who 
> can't wait for a real humor writer to come back.
>  
> This column is a case in point. I got the idea from a gifted writer 
> named Gene Weingarten who stole this idea from some kid named Danny 
> Jacobs, who asked Gene for his opinion of a humor piece he had done 
> for his college paper at the University of Maryland. Gene said it 
was 
> swell. Then Gene stole it. Now I'm rewriting it. This is all part 
of 
> my personal program to shame humor columnists to participate in 
chats 
> again. Gene stole the article to acquaint young journalists with 
> important truths. In this case: Beware, there are vultures 
everywhere.
> 
> For his article, Danny shaved one half of his face with a new, 
super-
> hyped five-blade razor, the other half with his trusty electric, 
and 
> then had fellow students feel which shave was closer. (The blade.) 
It 
> occurred to Gene that in the hands of a pro such as himself, this 
> idea would present an important journalistic opportunity to ask 
women 
> he did not know to stroke my face. Since I'm at least 35% more 
> perverted than Gene, I figured this would be fine excuse to get 
women 
> to cop a feel of my supple buttocks. 
> 
> Plus, I have a great ass. For the past 2 years -- to the derision 
of 
> my family and friends -- I have been riding my bicycle to and from 
> work on a heavy steel mountain bike from 1994. No sane person has 
> used a mountain bike this heavy since the era of carbon fiber 
> composites and titanium alloys; barring of course the waves of 
recent 
> immigrants who ride similar bikes to and from their jobs at the 
> Jerry's Subs and Pizza. I ride this way because I think it's cool 
to 
> ride a bike twice a day with something that weighs as much, 
> practically, than an Olson Twin. But that's really a bad simile, so 
I 
> tell people I do it because the heavier bike and fatter tires give 
me 
> a better work out. Here was an opportunity to discover whether all 
> this bike riding might actually be making my ass *too* good.
> 
> I rode into work yesterday using my heavy bike to get to work, only 
> using my left leg to pedal. Today, I used my lightweight racing 
bike 
> using only might right leg. In the interest of science, I am now 
> about to go out in the food court and ask 30 women to judge the 
> results. Hang on.
> 
> Okay, I'm back. I am pleased to report that all but three agreed to 
> participate. One of these turndowns, however, did not go well at 
all. 
> She listened patiently to my proposal and then wordlessly began to 
> run/walk away in the direction of the Pentagon's police staff, a 
> group of anti-terrorism specialists with submachine guns. Mustering 
> as much dignity as possible, I headed away, slowly but 
purposefully, 
> in the opposite direction.
> 
> Another turndown went like this:
> 
> Pam: Are you asking only women?
> 
> Me: Well . . . yes.
> 
> Pam: Why?
> 
> Me:
> 
> Pam: I'll do it if you get a man to do it first.
> 
> So I guess, in that case, it was actually I who declined.
>   
> Most women seemed to take this diagnostic task very seriously. 
> Several checked with the backs of their hands, like a mom testing 
for 
> fever. Philosophically, the experience was intriguing -- a metaphor 
> for the uncertainty of romance. The mechanics of a caress aren't 
all 
> that different from those of a slap; it's mostly a matter of 
emphasis.
> 
> At the Citibank ATM, I explained to a woman named Christianne what 
I 
> wanted her to do, and she asked: "You mean . . . with my hand?" I 
> stammered the first thing that came into my head: "Well, with 
> whatever you think appropriate." She did it anyway.
> 
> There were scary moments. One young woman named Carole heard my 
> pitch, and, stony-faced, immediately reached into her pocketbook 
> (mace?) and produced a business card (lawsuit?). Fortunately, she 
> just rubbed the edge of the card against my cheeks, listening for 
> differences in the scratching sound. "Disappointed I didn't use my 
> palm?" Carole asked. "No!" I lied.
> 
> Now I know what you are thinking: You are thinking that only a 
> perverted man would derive some sort of pleasure from this tiny, 
> silly degree of anonymous intimacy. And I'd have to say you were 
> right. I am completely ashamed of myself.
> 
> The final tally: Thirteen said the left side of my butt was firmer. 
> Thirteen said the right side was smoother. One could not decide.
> 
> In short, I may have to do it again. For science.
> 
> 
> 
> ***************************************************************
>


Reply via email to