how do we know he wanted to have sex in the public bathroom? Maybe he just wanted to pick up someone there and have it somewhere else? I'm still trying to figure out what the actual crime here was. Or maybe it wasn't a crime, just an ethics violation? What ethics violation?
--- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I couldn't agree with Gene more about the basic rights issue at stake > here. > ___________________________________ > While the whole concept of sex in a public bathroom baffles me (not > to mention the obvious logistical and hygenic difficulties), if the > toe-tapping, peeking through the stall and roller-bag placement are > all widely-accepted signals for gay men to initiate a sexual > encounter, then what did Senator Craig do wrong that hundreds of > thousands of people do every night in bars, clubs and parties? He > made a pass at somebody. > > I've made passes at some women and failed. Women and some men have > made passes at me, and have failed. Do any of us deserve jail time? > > That's like being pulled over for doing 55 in a 55 zone because you > *MIGHT* speed. > > He didn't have sex with the police officer in public. He may have > wanted to, or maybe he would have offered a romp at an airport hotel. > The Senator flirted with somebody at an ersatz pick-up joint. His > basic act was no different than a guy buying a drink for a girl at a > bar and using a cheesy pick-up line. > > If the Senator was engaged in public sex and the police found him, > then that would indeed be an offense. But has just the *intention* of > even wanting sex become a crime? >
