There are appointed people in the Department of Justice and there are long time people. I thought that she was a long timer who can't be tossed on her butt for her political leanings.
On 10/31/07, Ellen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So does Gene's wife work for the other side? I get the impression she > works for the atty gen office, who happens to be a republican because > the prez is republican. It's hard to say what she actually BELIEVES > based on just that she works for the atty gen office. Anyone know > more about this? > --- In [email protected], "areofilm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > My current S.O. thought I was a Republican the first time we met and I > > said, I'm probably more of a Libertarian than a Republican. She did > > research and came up with talking points for our first date. So after > > i snowed her over i won her over with my winning smile and personality. > > > > She won't miss a chance to badmouth a "Republican". When I told her > > there are nice people who are socially liberal but politically > > Republicans she said that even if they were, she couldn't stand anyone > > who would align themselves under that party. > > > > Life's too short to be concerned about what party the guy across the > > office or in the car next to you is. > > > > And as far as not dating someone just because they work for the other > > side, well, i wouldn't take it that seriously unless they've made it > > their life's work. We've all done jobs we hate to make a buck. To > > paraphrase one of my life's motto's. > > > > "Everyone sucks money's c*ck" > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ray Bradley" > > <clavenia@> wrote: > > > > > > I got a kick out of the question from the young woman who wasn't > going > > > to date a Republican. We've been talking about this at work, and > while > > > both laughing at and trying to defend her statements, a bigger > question > > > came up: > > > > > > what REALLY are the differences between the Republicans and Democrats > > > anymore? > > > > > > The lines are so blurred anymore - none of the major Democratic > > > candidates are saying they want an immediate troop withdrawal from > > > Iraq, all Dems and Repubs are hemming and hawing about Iran, nobody > > > seems to have a cohesive tax policy. Lots of bloggers and columnists > > > have pointed out that Giuliani and Clinton share views on many of the > > > major issues. All candidates are talking about alternative fuels and > > > tax breaks for ultra-efficient vehicles. Everybody wants better > > > schools, nobody's taking shots at No Child Left Behind and the > only two > > > guys consistently shooting straight answers anymore - Dennis Kucinich > > > and Ron Paul - are merely afterthoughts. > > > > > > About the one constant is that *most* Republicans are against > abortion, > > > and *most* Democrats support a woman's choice. That's about it. Every > > > other issue is completely blurred. > > > > > > Or has the country been geared towards Republican vs. Democrat for so > > > long that the parties have failed to see where the lines have been > > > drawn? > > > > > > - Ray > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
