I've been to Beland's office.  It's pretty impressive:  Magnets covering
a good chunk of a metal wall & door.  9 or 10 inkers on his mantle.
Various other 1st place prices from when the Czar ran the contest
(pre-Inker days).

 

He gave away a BUNCH of T-shirts (runner-up prizes from the Czar's
reign) at the last Flushies award ceremony.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ellen
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [wc] Re: Style Invitational winners...

 

Those guys are going to run out of room in their dressers and
refrigerators for all the t shirts and magnets.

--- In [email protected]
<mailto:weingartenchatters%40yahoogroups.com> , "Randy Lee"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Ellen,
> 
> 
> 
> Most SI winners aren't any smarter than you. They just spend time
> figuring out how to best "play the game."
> 
> 
> 
> I haven't entered much in the last few months (just been too busy),
but
> for this one, there'd be a basic technique I'm sure most followed:
> 
> 
> 
> 1. Go through a dictionary (as long as you have the time for -
> obviously you can't look at the whole thing)
> 2. When you come to a word that has an ending that sounds amusing,
> write it down, then see if there's another amusing word that starts
> somewhere near the ending of the word.
> 3. See if you can think of a definition that incorporates both
> words, and maybe has a pun in it to boot.
> 
> 
> 
> I can guarantee there were plenty of base words those submitters
didn't
> know either (that just sounded funny), before breaking out Mr.
Webster.
> 
> 
> 
> Some of the SI "Losers" spend HOURS every week on this. It's really
> more (a) figuring out HOW to start, (b) putting in some TIME to look
for
> something funny, (c) coming up with an ANGLE (usually a pun), and
> rewriting (usually tightening & shortening - "brevity is the soul of
> wit").
> 
> 
> 
> Every contest is different, of course. And yes, there are definitely a
> handful of Losers I'd put in the genius category (Russ Beland, Chris
> Doyle, Brendan Beary, Kevin Dopart, and of course Chuck Smith -- plus
> Jennifer Hart if she ever started entering again). But even they have
> to work at it, most of the time.
> 
> 
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [email protected]
<mailto:weingartenchatters%40yahoogroups.com> 
> [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:weingartenchatters%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of David Patch
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:weingartenchatters%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: [wc] Re: Style Invitational winners...
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected]
<mailto:weingartenchatters%40yahoogroups.com> 
> <mailto:weingartenchatters%40yahoogroups.com> , "Ellen"
> <ellengoodman6@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > are clearly WAY smarter than me. Today I learned 3 new words!
> > sebum--the stuff that causes oily hair and skin (lovely, right?)
> > threnody--an elegy
> > dishabille--dressed casually or carelessly
> > 
> > Funny thing, the contest was to create portmanteau words and someone
> > created "yiddishabille," and I wasn't even sure if the original word
> > was "dishabille" or "shabille"--that is how unfamiliar I was with
it.
> > I guess it's like "disheveled"? Shabille doesn't exist, so I figured
> > it must be dishabille. This is why I don't enter this contest--I
> > wouldn't stand a chance. More power to these people who are
> > apparently experts in the field of obscure words.
> 
> The opposite of dishabille is probably habille. It's a cognate for a 
> French word meaning the same thing.
> 
> It may not be familiar to it, but it would appear to be derived from 
> the same linguistic root as "disheveled".
> 
> David Patch
> (Word Geek)
>

 

Reply via email to