Jozef Hartinger wrote: > Could you file a CDITCK issue and assign it to me? Thanks. >
Thanks Jozef, It's at https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-203. I'm pretty sure I don't have permission to assign you tasks, though. :) -- Scott > On 01/06/2011 03:24 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: >> This test has a implementation-dependency on how interception is >> implemented (requires proxy implementation), but the proxy >> implementation is not mandated by the spec (and the EJB spec has always >> allowed both implementation methods.) >> >> The test calls SimpleBean.getId(), which is intercepted by Interceptor1. >> >> Interceptor1's aroundInvoke calls target.getId(), which is a circular >> reference for extension and only works for proxy-based interception: >> >> class SimpleBean { >> @Interceptors(Interceptor1.class) >> public int getId() >> { >> return id; >> } >> ... >> } >> >> class Interceptor1 { >> @AroundInvoke >> public Object aroundInvoke(InvocationContext ctx) throws Exception >> { >> SimpleBean target = (SimpleBean) ctx.getTarget(); >> int id1 = target.getId(); >> ... >> } >> } >> >> The only change needed to the test is to create a SimpleBean.getBareId() >> which is not an intercepted method. >> >> (Or, if the spec is re-interpreted to require a proxy implementation, >> there should be an explicit test for it, not an implicit dependency like >> this test.) >> >> -- Scott >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > > _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
