On 02/03/2011, at 11:53 AM, Dan Allen wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 14:52, Brian Leathem <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Some of these issues have been already resolved in Weld, and can be
> worked around by using a Weld SNAPSHOT.  However, it is probable that
> more issues will arise as more people start using Seam 3, and a quick
> turnaround on Weld releases would help greatly with user acceptance of
> Seam 3.  It would also bode well for containers that were quick to adopt
> the Weld maintenance releases.
> 
> 
> I want to emphasize how critical it is that we keep problems at bay as we 
> near the first release of Seam 3. We've really asked the growing Seam 3 user 
> community to stomach a lot of complications and thus far, they've been 
> hanging in there and working around the problems. But we need to get these 
> problems behind us, swiftly, and let them focus on their real business 
> problems and not exceptions. It doesn't just help the acceptance of Seam 3, 
> it's crucial to it.
> 
> -Dan


I agree, to the best of my knowledge every other RI that is part of EE does 
regular maintenance releases, and I think we should as well. I think to do 
otherwise will just hurt adoption.

Stuart

>  
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
> 
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

Reply via email to