I think this is an extremely bad idea, the last thing weld should do
as the RI is promote writing non portable apps.

--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete

On 30 Apr 2011, at 08:18, Ales Justin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would actually think Weld could/should expose this, not CDI.
> As exposing TM is definitely not per spec, hence not CDI's "business".
> Otoh, building Tx based Seam3 components would again depend on Weld 
> workaround; e.g. Seam Conversation.
>
> TM also exposes XAResource handling, for which TxServices don't have matching 
> api.
> And like I said, there is also suspend/resume Tx API, which sometimes also 
> comes in handy.
>
> If TxServices::getTM returns an actual TM instance, then Weld could expose it 
> as a bean.
> But purely optional from the Services implementor --> null TM == no TM bean.
>
> -Ales
>
> On Apr 30, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> I'm not 100% sure what you mean, as TransactionServices exposes services to 
>> Weld which uses them to (a) expose UTX as a bean and (b) register for 
>> synchronizations for TX events. So just adding TM to TransactionServices 
>> won't do very much ;-), you would also need to expose TM as a bean. Weld 
>> could do this, but in general in Weld we've tried to avoid exposing built in 
>> beans (especially for standard APIs) which aren't spec defined as this could 
>> interfere with other people. So better to propose this for CDI 1.1 IMO.
>>
>> On 29 Apr 2011, at 17:26, Ales Justin wrote:
>>
>>> IMO TransactionServices should also expose TransactionManager.
>>>
>>> Since with AS7, which hides TM from JNDI, one cannot easily register 
>>> XAResources:
>>>
>>> Transaction
>>> public boolean enlistResource(XAResource xaRes) throws RollbackException, 
>>> IllegalStateException, SystemException
>>>
>>> or suspending/resuming current Tx.
>>> Specially XAResources handling is a must to be able to enlist if you're 
>>> doing some non-trivial tx-based work.
>>>
>>> This way the integration layer would make sure the TM is exposed as a CDI 
>>> service.
>>>
>>> Wdyt?
>>>
>>> -Ales
>>>
>>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

Reply via email to