Yeah, hence I mention that this could be added/done as well, as it's not. Or is there a reason on why it's not?
On Jul 20, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Aslak Knutsen wrote: > That is what's being done: > > https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-weld/pull/1/files > > -aslak- > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ales Justin <[email protected]> wrote: >> public EntityManagerFactory resolvePersistenceUnit(InjectionPoint >> injectionPoint) >> { >> return null; >> } >> >> This method could probably be also implemented then, with same limitations. >> >> On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Pete Muir wrote: >> >>> It seems ok to me as long as we document any limitations carefully. >>> >>> On 18 Jul 2011, at 12:01, Aslak Knutsen wrote: >>> >>>> Heya >>>> >>>> Michal has a branch of the Arquillian Weld EE Mock Containers where he >>>> has implemented a v. of JPAInjectionService that can handle simple >>>> creation of PersistenceContext using >>>> Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory() >>>> >>>> https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-weld/pull/1 >>>> >>>> This could open up for some easy / lightweight cdi + jpa testing. >>>> >>>> Simply using @PersistenceContext in your CDI Beans. >>>> >>>> Is this useful as is, or is it to 'risky' without >>>> TransactionManagement support etc etc etc.. >>>> >>>> wdyt? >>>> >>>> -aslak- >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> weld-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> weld-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
