Tomas Remes pointed out that the new/upcoming version contains the new sentence which also mentions @Interceptor.
I think it's related to: https://github.com/javaee/interceptors-spec/issues/27 But it's hard to guess as it's not possible to track the changes - sources are binary files. Martin Dne 1.6.2017 v 08:07 Martin Kouba napsal(a): > Hi Emily, > > I suppose you're talking about section 5.3 Ordering Interceptors using > the Priority Annotation: > "The Priority annotation is ignored on interceptors bound to a component > using the Interceptors annotation." > > There is a very old clarification issue for the interceptor spec: > https://github.com/javaee/interceptors-spec/issues/23 > (originally INTERCEPTORS_SPEC-23) > > Martin > > Dne 31.5.2017 v 14:53 Emily Jiang napsal(a): >> Hi Martin, >> >> In the updated Interceptor spec, it has the following statement: >> >> "The Interceptor annotation is ignored on interceptor classes bound >> using the Interceptorsannotation." >> >> I assume this already the case in Weld 2.x, CDI 1.2 implementation. >> Right? >> >> Many thanks, >> Emily >> =========================== >> Emily Jiang >> WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead >> >> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN >> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278 >> >> Email: [email protected] >> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB >> >> Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >> number 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 >> 3AU >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >> > -- Martin Kouba Senior Software Engineer Red Hat, Czech Republic _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
