[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597038#comment-12597038
]
Pete Muir commented on WELD-778:
--------------------------------
We can't solve this with the current SPI AFAICS. We need to completely revisit
how extensions are processed. I admit that when I wrote this originally, the
stuff I did with classloading/structure seemed a little bit odd, and I think I
just didn't see that extensions need to be per bda and call events for any bean
on extensions defined in that bda for any classes that are resolvable.
The primary issue I wanted to avoid with the previous design was that events
would be called multiple times for the same bean/class on the same extension,
however if we only ever call events on extensions within the bda then I think
this won't be a problem.
I would propose we redesign the SPI so that loadExtensions is per BDA not per
app.
> Weld must be able to support extension discovery in the modules of an
> multi-module application (EAR)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WELD-778
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-778
> Project: Weld
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API
> Affects Versions: 1.1.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Marius Bogoevici
> Fix For: TBC
>
>
> Currently, only extensions which are visible to the entire application (i.e.
> all modules) are installed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
