[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12672517#comment-12672517 ]
Marko Lukša commented on WELD-999: ---------------------------------- Actually, it's not broken. I have added another test - one that actually invokes an intercepted method and checks if both interceptors were invoked. The test passes. So the actual problem is only with {{BeanManager.resolveInterceptors(InterceptionType type, Annotation... interceptorBindings)}}. In weld-core, the {{interceptorBindings}} parameter is always flattened ({{AbstractClassBean.flattenInterceptorBindings()}}) before being passed to the method. In {{InterceptorBindingTransitivityTest}} however, {{resolveInterceptors()}} is called without flattening interceptor bindings first (e.g. {{resolveInterceptors(InterceptionType.AROUND_INVOKE, new UltraSynchronizedLiteral())}}. So the real question is whether {{BeanManager.resolveInterceptors()}} should flatten the interceptorBindings itself or whether the caller should to this. > Interceptor binding transitivity broken > --------------------------------------- > > Key: WELD-999 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-999 > Project: Weld > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Interceptors and Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.1.2.Final > Reporter: Jozef Hartinger > Assignee: Marko Lukša > Fix For: 1.2.0.Beta1 > > > See > org.jboss.weld.tests.interceptors.binding.transitivity.InterceptorBindingTransitivityTest -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira _______________________________________________ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues