> > Also, I've been having a very good experience with sidekiq instead of > resque.
Is this in context of enabling threadsafe! or in general? What do you like in sidekiq that's not so good in resque? Cheers, K. On Monday, September 3, 2012 5:29:34 AM UTC+2, nahum wrote: > > has anyone been doing this? > > I've got a backend intranet app and unreleased app that are running with > this enabled in combination with "thin --threaded". Works a charm so for, > although it's neither are very complicated. I'm looking at trying a more > complitade Rails 3.2 app with it and puma, and wondering if anyone has had > experience with that setup? > > Also, I've been having a very good experience with sidekiq instead of > resque. > > cheers, > nahum > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WellRailed" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/wellrailed/-/XFh4w0aNA1YJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wellrailed?hl=en.
