Aurelien, I now see what you are saying. Yes, that does look more elegant. I will try to implement (of course for me now it requires unwinding all the patch code so I might tackle a little later).
-Lukas Lukas Oberhuber -----Original Message----- From: Aurélien Gâteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 December 2006 09:47 To: Lukas Oberhuber Cc: 'Jérôme WAGNER'; wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com Subject: Re: FW: [Wengophone-devel] Performance Issue Lukas Oberhuber wrote: > Arelien, > > The patch I attached in the previous message already does what you suggest. > I was mostly explaining what I had done, but I guess I didn't make that > clear enough. Yes, it does. But I believe my solution is a bit nicer because it does not require adding another parameter to the various add*Item() methods while still ensuring the list is always sorted, without having to call sort() manually. > I think my patch is pretty good to go into the code base. > > The next thing would probably be to work on the encode64 functions. I'm going to give it a look, just haven't had time to do so now. Aurélien _______________________________________________ Wengophone-devel mailing list Wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel
