Suppose I have page a.html, which has a link to b.html. If a is not changed, and b is changed. When I process a, I have no way to check a so that I can process b too, without downloading a. -N will cause a not to be downloaded, but not processed either, so change of b will be ignored. If I will -nc, then a will be processed, and b too, but b's change will still be ignored. If a new page c is linked into b now, then c won't get noticed. Is this a feature or it's a bug? Thanks. Jiangcheng Bao
- Re: wget timestamping (-N) bug/feature? Bao, Jiangcheng
- Re: wget timestamping (-N) bug/feature? Ian Abbott
- Re: wget timestamping (-N) bug/feature? Bao, Jiangcheng
- Re: wget timestamping (-N) bug/feature? Mengmeng Zhang
- Re: wget timestamping (-N) bug/feature? David VanHorn
- Re: wget timestamping (-N) bug/feature? Bao, Jiangcheng