On 12/04/2002 21:37:31 hniksic wrote:
>"Tony Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hrvoje Niksic wrote: >> >>> > Is there any way to make Wget use HTTP/1.1 ? >>> >>> Unfortunately, no. >> >> In looking at the debug output, it appears to me that wget is really >> sending HTTP/1.1 headers, but claiming that they are HTTP/1.0 >> headers. For example, the Host header was not defined in RFC 1945, >> but wget is sending it. > >Yes. That is by design -- HTTP was meant to be extended in that way. >Wget is also requesting and accepting `Keep-Alive', using `Range', and >so on. > >Csaba Raduly's patch would break Wget because it doesn't suppose the >"chunked" transfer-encoding. Also, its understanding of persistent >connection might not be compliant with HTTP/1.1. IT WAS A JOKE ! Serves me right. I need to put bigger smilies :-( -- Csaba Ráduly, Software Engineer Sophos Anti-Virus email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sophos.com US Support: +1 888 SOPHOS 9 UK Support: +44 1235 559933
