On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Herold Heiko wrote: > Did you know wget is currently in lack of a maintainer ?
the GNU website says (http://www.gnu.org/help/help.html): We are looking for new maintainers for these GNU packages (contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> if you'd like to volunteer): * GNU dumb * The Hyperbole GNU Emacs Package * wget (which still has a maintainer, but he would like to step down) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ so, i didn't think that wget was unmaintained. > If you have time to perform those enhancements you enlistened you should > probably apply as (at least temporary) maintainer. > This wouldn't mean you would be forced to devolve more time to wget than you > can and want, or tackle issus you really are not currently interested with - > but still the community would be gratefull. > > Even a maintainer only partially present would be better than the current > hiatus and a branch. > On the other hand, if you could/would take over full wget development that > would be even better. i'll certainly do. thanks ;-) -- Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem... Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deep Space 6 - IPv6 with Linux http://www.deepspace6.net Ferrara Linux User Group http://www.ferrara.linux.it
