-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>  Otherwise it looks OK, I think.  Though I am not sure whether it is 
> really needed given that many years have passed and nobody wanted such a 
> feature.  But the decision is up to the maintainer (once you sort out 
> technical problems).

I really have to disagree here. I have seen this request more than once,
and more than once have wished for it myself.

In any case, _not_ providing it makes reasonably secure invocation from
the commandline overly difficult.

- --
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer...
http://micah.cowan.name/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGp5NL7M8hyUobTrERCAFbAJ4t0f931nubpN1EC0Qzg27ibEsaIACfc/vX
wjeh8DnSxgVNqgi1C55JdcY=
=X1C9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to