-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>>> It just occurred to me that this change breaks backward compatibility.
>>> It will break scripts that try to clean up after Wget or that in any
>>> way depend on the current naming scheme.
>> It may. I am not going to commit to never ever changing the current
>> naming scheme.
> 
> Agreed, but there should be a very good reason for changing it, and
> the change should be a clear improvement.

How do those reasons differ? :)

> In my view, neither is the
> case here.

It seems like a fairly clear improvement to me; at least, I believe that
the improvement would outweigh the rather mild risk that it might break
something. It's a mild improvement, but it's an even milder risk, AFAICT.

> For example, the change to respect the Content-Disposition
> header constitutes a good reason[1].

(I don't seem to have the footnote you seem to have intended to put there.)

I'm not sure how good an example Content-Disposition is, though, given
that the risk of backwards-incompatibility is probably virtually nil. In
that this is a more general change, whereas that is a specific change
(to a certain subset of URLs).

Of course, your opinion is important to me, and to be honest, I didn't
expect to find any resistance to this idea (there were no comments
besides mine on the original post back in July). So I welcome further
feedback. However, at the moment, I don't see any compelling reason not
to apply the change, and do find reason to apply it (interoperability
seems like a desirable trait).

Hm... wget-patches seems not to be archived... There's a supposed link
to a gmane archive, but it's apparently empty. :\ That makes it
difficult to refer to the original post from July 13.

- --
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer...
http://micah.cowan.name/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHLuyC7M8hyUobTrERCJ1lAJ99AfiCPkjPra9UlBakgyKlUMhyFQCfY0ht
57y31BM4+6YFadFnhkVH62Q=
=UQ5g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to