Henri Sivonen wrote:
What should text/html flavor conformance checkers say about <foo />?

Silently treat as <foo>> as per SGML?

Yes.

Silently treat as <foo> as per real world?

Intentionally buggy/broken behaviour should not be carried over into conformance checkers.


Report a warning?

Yes.

Report an error?

I don't think it should be an error. A warning like the WDG validator issues is appropriate.


What about <foo/>?

Same as <foo />.

--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
http://GetFirefox.com/     Rediscover the Web
http://GetThunderbird.com/ Reclaim your Inbox



Reply via email to