On 5/9/05, James Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But can you do it such that it will work without javascript? I consider > distinguishing read/unread messages to be a basic enough feature that it > should be possible to implement it without requiring client-side > scripting. In this case, the obvious implementation would be a > javascript function called when the message was recieved that performed > a background POST request to update the read flag on the message. Is > there a better way? Well, you could load an iframe with a redirect meta element, which will then, uhm, use GET to modify the state. That's all I can think off, though.
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="..."... Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="...&... Ian Bicking
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="..." method=... Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="..." me... Ian Bicking
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="..."... Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="..." me... James Graham
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="..."... Matthew Thomas
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="...&... James Graham
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href="... Sjoerd Visscher
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a href=&... James Graham
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Mark Wubben
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Mark Wubben
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Kornel Lesinski
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Mark Wubben
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Sjoerd Visscher
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Michael Gratton
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Michael Gratton
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... James Graham
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... Kornel Lesinski
- Re: [whatwg] A thought: <a hr... James Graham
