Jim Ley wrote:
On 6/21/05, Matthew Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Raymond wrote:
Now that I think about it, wouldn't the following be valid also?...
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
| "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
| <X3D xmlns="http://www.web3d.org/specifications/x3d-3.0.xsd";
Of course not, there is no X3D element in the above dtd.
Oh, I see. This was a suggestion in the XHTML 1.0 spec of how
namespaces MIGHT be used. [1] I guess it's out of date.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#well-formed
