On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, James Graham wrote: > > > > The problem is if I state one thing explicitly, then people will want > > something else stated ("does it allow IDNs?" "does it allow UTF-8 > > characters?" "does it allow fragment identifiers?"). Why should one > > aspect of something be redundantly stated? > > Because it's identified by people who do read RFCs as an obvious and > problematic source of confusion for those who don't.
So are the others. :-) But fair enough. Added a note. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'