Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, fantasai wrote:
I'd like to suggest that ID attributes use a different syntax than [] to
mark repetition placeholders,
...
Ok, I allowed two other characters to be used in the place of [] as well.
In principle, that's a good idea. But do you really expect a typical
author to remember that they should, or even be able to, type ⁅ and ⁆,
instead of [ and ] for id attributes, considering that they don't appear
most keyboards and they may not even have any fonts with those glyphs
available? Personally, I prefer Matthew's idea to use a templateid
attribute.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
