Eugene T.S. Wong wrote:
A semantic markup language can't possibly have every single type of
semantic out there. There are some cases that are so rare, that it would
be a waste to define them. Sometimes <BIG> really does convey something.
For example:
<P>I said, "<BIG>NO!</BIG>".</P>
<P><BIG>YES!!</BIG> I will do it!</P>
<P><BIG><BIG>NO!</BIG></BIG> You will not!</P>
<P><BIG><BIG>YES!!</BIG></BIG> I will do it!</P>
<P><BIG><BIG><BIG>NO!</BIG></BIG></BIG> You will not!</P>
<P><BIG><BIG><BIG>YES!!</BIG></BIG></BIG> I will do it!</P>
<P><BIG><BIG><BIG><BIG>NO!</BIG></BIG></BIG></BIG> You will not!</P>
<P><SMALL>Oh, alright...</SMALL></P>
No, your using a presentational element where a suitable semantic
element already exists. It is irrelevant that it doesn't have the
default styling that you want from big, but that can be handled with
CSS. That example should be marked up like this:
<p>I said, "<em>NO!</em>".</p>
<p><em>YES!!</em> I will do it!</p>
<p><em><em>NO!</em></em> You will not!</p>
<p><em><em>YES!!</em></em> I will do it!</p>
<p><em><em><em>NO!</em></em></em> You will not!</p>
<p><em><em><em>YES!!</em></em></em> I will do it!</p>
<p><em><em><em><em>NO!</em></em></em></em> You will not!</p>
<p>Oh, alright...</p>
em { font-size: larger; }
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
