BTW, we tried to add <span> as an inline that should be reopened
(like <font> and <b> etc.) and it broke some of our layout tests
(snippets of real-world Web sites). <span> clearly does not always
reopen in WinIE and Firefox, so for now we are having to leave it out.
dave
On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Blanchard, Todd wrote:
What I want to know is: if the "cloned" node has an id attribute,
and id is meant to be unique, then how do we resolve this
conflict? I mention this because bad html and duplicate id's in
documents have caused havoc when trying to build javascript
applications.
-Todd Blalnchard
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:whatwg-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [whatwg] Update to the Adoption Agency Algorithm
Just a note to those of you who reviewed the new parsing rules
yesterday:
I changed them today to take into account some feedback from Hyatt.
Basically the old algorithm was creating too many nodes. This is
now fixed, the algorithm only moves the nodes that are being
closed, not the other inlines it happens to cross.
http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#closing
Cheers,
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )
\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _
\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--
(,_..'`-.;.'