Douglas Crockford wrote: > The JSONRequest does only one thing: <snip>
Are you planning to take the excellent advice from <I forget who> to change the name? The name XmlHttpRequest sucks because it doesn't necessarily return XML, and it doesn't have to be over HTTP. Let's not tie the name of a new thing solely to the way we use it at the moment. Why not just call it "Request", and have an API to set the Accept: header, so people can set it to "application/json"? You could even make that the default. Gerv