On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Stefan Gössner wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > > > > > In prototype based languages it is almost impossible to implement > > > 'with' effectively in the given notation. > > > > > > ctx.moveTo(0,0).lineTo(10,10); > > > > > > is more effective. In some circumstances - in times. > > > > Why is it more effective for JS? > > see > http://yuiblog.com/blog/2006/04/11/with-statement-considered-harmful/
I'm familiar with this, but it doesn't seem to be relevant for this case since all the method names are predefined and well-known. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'