On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:09:53 -0700, Aaron Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm suggesting something else, more like:
1) Use the role and state documents that will be public drafts soon, to
find gaps in your set of elements. If those semantics aren't available
in your set of fully functional elements then it's worth thinking about.
By all means provide authors with something easier that they'll want to
use -- that is certainly better.
I very much agree. There's has been quite some research into the role=""
values I suppose and that is certainly something the WHATWG should be
looking at, as you say, to identify gaps and looking at what accessibility
"tools" need.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
