Le 6 nov. 2006 à 12:32, Sander Tekelenburg a écrit :

Another thing is that whether the annotation should be considered a footnote, endnote or whateverelsenote seems to me a presentational issue, so I'm not that enthusiastic about calling it a <footnote> element. Why not simply <annotation>? You can then allow the author to decide where in the page, or in a group of pages, to place the <annotation> element, and use CSS for the presentational aspects. (You could allow the same with <foonote>, but that
name suggest it must only be used for footnotes.)

I agree that it's a problem with the name <footnote>. On the other side, <annotation> makes me think of something the user added in the margin, while <footnote> better evoke the complementary relation a footnote has with the text.

While I prefer <footnote>, I think both can do fine.


Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michelf.com/


Reply via email to