--- Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 9, 2007, at 19:46, Jonathan Worent wrote: > > > There are plenty of elements in the spec right > > now that aren't likely to be used often, but they're still in the > > spec because they have merit. > > Actually, there are elements that don't have much merit (e.g. > <samp>), but trying to pretend that they don't exist and aren't > interoperably presented isn't worth the trouble.
What I was trying to say is that it will be impossible to predict an elements usage. Using that as a gauge to determine if something will or won't be added to the spec isn't a fair argument. > > -- > Henri Sivonen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never Miss an Email Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail
