Re: [whatwg] several messages about HTML5

[Gervase Markham]

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:41:12 +0100, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
Surely it would make much more sense to have all the predefined class 
names start with a dash? After all, XHTML5 is not yet standardised, 
whereas people have been using all sorts of random class names for 
years - but, I suspect, mostly without a leading dash.

This is similar to the C/C++ thing of having reserved symbols like 
__LINE__ start with an underscore.

Surely it would make much more sense to have HTML parsers should stop at 
the first error too. This is similar to C/C++ compilers throwing an 
error at you.

I don't see how the analogy holds. Why is using a fairly clean namespace 
for predefined class names instead of a well-used one the same sort of 
thing as having HTML parsers stop at the first error?

(I guess I'm making an underlying assumption here that there aren't 
loads of existing pages on the web using HTML 5 predefined class names 
while expecting HTML 5 rendering and semantics for them. But, unless I'm 
missing something, that seems like a reasonable assumption.)

Gerv