Ah
Let me rephrase the proposal:
replace
"A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are
orthogonal."
with
"A disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the disabled
and read-write states are orthogonal."
current description could fool more people :)
Regards,
Rikkert Koppes
Anne van Kesteren schreef:
Quoting Rikkert Koppes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...] A
disabled control can still match this pseudo-class; the states are
orthogonal.
I believe the term "orthogonal" is incorrect here.
:read-write is orthogonal to :disabled. That's correct.
