On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote: > > > > Ok, I've added a rel value similar to "nofollow" called "noreferer" > > that does this. > > While we are unable correct the spelling of "referer", we certainly need > not duplicate it for "noreferrer". There must be some end to this > self-humiliation. Cheers, Chris
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the feature > affects the Referer (sic) header. I think Anne's right about this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'